close
Do you like trackitt?
  • jQuery News Ticker now has support for multiple tickers per page!
  • jQuery News Ticker now has support for right-to-left languages!
  • jQuery News Ticker now has support for loading content via an RSS feed!
  • jQuery News Ticker now has an optional fade effect between items!
  • New updates have been made to jQuery News Ticker! Check below for more details!
  • jQuery News Ticker is now compatible with jQuery 1.3.2! See below for further details and for latest download.
  • Further updates to jQuery News Ticker are coming soon!

Member Profile: alext (19 posts)

Advertisement    
 
Hello, I'm alext (report this user)
I am from India
I last logged in on 07 Nov 2017
I have been a member since 16 Aug 2016
I have added 19 posts in trackitt forums
I added my last post on 07 Nov 2017
alext's Immigration Cases
 
I-485 case: Pending for 1137 days (465 days more than average)   (0 comments)
User: alext Nationality: India
Country of Chargeability:IndiaApplicant Type:dependent
Service Center:NebraskaCategory:EB2
Priority Date:29 Jan 2009Application Filed:15 Mar 2015
USCIS Received Date:15 Apr 2015USCIS Notice Date:
USCIS Receipt Number:I-140/485 Filing:non-concurrent
I-140 Processing Type:regularI-140 Approval Date:
First Fingerprint Date:Second Fingerprint Date:
RFE Received?:RFE Received Date:
Reason for RFE:RFE Replied Date:
Case Transferred to:Transfer Date:
Name Check Status:Name Check Approval Date:
I-485 Status:pendingI-485 Approval/Denial Date:
Card Production Ordered:Card Received Date:
EAD Applied?:AP Applied?:
EAD Approval Date:AP Approval Date:
EAD Received:AP Received:
Time to Get EAD Approval:Time to Get AP Approval:
Time to Get Fingerprinting Done:Total Time to Get GC:
Most Recent LUD:Days Elapsed:1135 days
Experience:
Case Added to Tracker: 16 Aug 2016 Last Updated: 08 Apr 2017
Notes:
alext's Posts
Posted in I-485 Forum on 07 Nov 2017
Topic: pending I485 Follow to Join-EB2I

I know it is too early but I wanted to be prepared well before to find out how to face interview at Montreal Canada. If anyone has faced interview for spouse? And what kind of question they ask. Please give me your feedback. My priority date is Jan 31, 2009.
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-485 Forum on 11 Sep 2017
Topic: Oct 2017 VB Prediction

or come to canada :)
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-485 Forum on 12 Apr 2017
Topic: Law Suit against porting : advice required.

Can you please post the name of the lawyer, email address and phone number so that we can contact him to file the lawsuit?
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-485 Forum on 12 Apr 2017
Topic: WhiteHouse Petition: Stop EB3 to EB2 Portability

Why not? Read this article-
https://www.facebook.com/gitakapurlaw/posts/5472...
When they can file the case why not us? We need to find a ruling which can affect this decision. We need to stop retention of priority date.
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-485 Forum on 11 Apr 2017
Topic: WhiteHouse Petition: Stop EB3 to EB2 Portability

Awesome, this thread already created. Let us work on finding the way to file a lawsuit against this ruling. We are not against the porting, but we are against retention of priority date based on the experience which they got after EB3. Once I will get response from my lawyer, I will update everyone.
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-485 Forum on 11 Apr 2017
Topic: May 2017 - Visa Bulletin Prediction

Per Jan 2017 inventory, we have 12, 895 pending applications for EB3 until 2008 and they will keep upgrading to EB2. We are not against porting. But against retention of priority date which is not fair at all. Because EB3 became eligible by gaining the experience after that date not prior to it.
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-485 Forum on 11 Apr 2017
Topic: May 2017 - Visa Bulletin Prediction

Let us start asking our lawyers about Priority Date Retention rule. I am going to send an email to my lawyer but everyone else can do the same. This is a policy of USCIS. There should be some ways which we can find and file a lawsuit. Our request will be to allow porting but retention of priority date should be allowed only in the case, if candidate proves that he was eligible for EB2 even before filing for EB3. If they are using the experience after getting EB3 and upgrading to EB2 then their date should be the date when they become eligible for EB2. This will definitely prevent retrogression and we will see only forward movement. Let us work together and find some ways to fight against this policy of USCIS.
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-485 Forum on 11 Apr 2017
Topic: May 2017 - Visa Bulletin Prediction

This is what they should be doing since the beginning of year. They should only increase the dates on last 4 months of fiscal year, so at least real EB2 could have got the visa they deserve. This way it would at least prevent additional porters. Law is not fair with EB2. EB3 porters should be able to retain the old date, only if they prove that they were eligible for EB2 since the beginning . Otherwise they should be given the date when they port to EB2. Is there any way we can create this petition or file a lawsuit against the retaining the date? If not why we don't have option to port to EB1 from EB2 after these many years of experience?
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-485 Forum on 09 Apr 2017
Topic: Dec 2009 EB2 Priority Date

What about Jan29, 2009?
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 08 Apr 2017
Topic: H.R. 392, Fairness for High Skilled Immigrants Act

Total 173..
Cosponsor statistics: 173 current - includes 25 original
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-485 Forum on 08 Apr 2017
Topic: Pending Employment-Based I-485 Inventory - January 2017

Any prediction based on Jan 2017 Pending Inventory?
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-485 Forum on 06 Apr 2017
Topic: Pending Employment-Based I-485 Inventory - January 2017

any prediction, Jan 2017 Inventory released already?
https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/USCIS/...
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-485 Forum on 19 Jan 2017
Topic: Mar-2017 VISA bulletin Predictions

True, unless you start sending letter to Senators/Congressman's, you will stay here and watching EB1C taking visas for years ahead.
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 07 Jan 2017
Topic: Issa bill h1 b

If you know the EB1C fraud, please report to https://www.oig.dhs.gov/hotline/hotline.php
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 07 Jan 2017
Topic: How to report EB1-C abuse?

If you know the EB1C fraud, please report to https://www.oig.dhs.gov/hotline/hotline.php
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-485 Forum on 07 Jan 2017
Topic: EB3 India March 2005 PD folks

Congratulations!

If you know the EB1C fraud, please report to https://www.oig.dhs.gov/hotline/hotline.php
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-485 Forum on 07 Jan 2017
Topic: EB2 India PD AUG 2009 current ?

Don't worry, Once USCIS find the frauds in GC filings from consulting companies for EB1C, all the Green cards given will be rejected and they will be permanently banned to US.
EB2I will get nearly 10K visa this year because EB1C days are over.

The statute that discusses immigration fraud and misrepresentation is the Immigration and Nationality Act section 212(a)(6)(c)(i). Fraud is the false representation of a material fact knowing of the falsity of the representation and intending to deceive a consular or immigration officer. Misrepresentation is an assertion contrary to the facts. To be punishable, the fraud or misrepresentation must be willful, and usually requires some affirmative act by the applicant. In addition, the fraud or misrepresentation must pertain to a material fact. A fact is material if the adjudication of the application would have changed had the fact been different. In other words, if the applicant would have been inadmissible on the true facts, or if the fraud or misrepresentation forecloses a line of inquiry relevant to whether the applicant is eligible which could have resulted in an accurate determination of admissibility, then the fact is material.
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 07 Jan 2017
Topic: EB1C / EB1 C CTS GIT Experience - 2015/2016

Don't worry, Once USCIS find the frauds in GC filings from consulting companies for EB1C, all the Green cards given will be rejected and they will be permanently banned to US.

The statute that discusses immigration fraud and misrepresentation is the Immigration and Nationality Act section 212(a)(6)(c)(i). Fraud is the false representation of a material fact knowing of the falsity of the representation and intending to deceive a consular or immigration officer. Misrepresentation is an assertion contrary to the facts. To be punishable, the fraud or misrepresentation must be willful, and usually requires some affirmative act by the applicant. In addition, the fraud or misrepresentation must pertain to a material fact. A fact is material if the adjudication of the application would have changed had the fact been different. In other words, if the applicant would have been inadmissible on the true facts, or if the fraud or misrepresentation forecloses a line of inquiry relevant to whether the applicant is eligible which could have resulted in an accurate determination of admissibility, then the fact is material.
I don't like this postI like this post