close
Do you like trackitt?
  • jQuery News Ticker now has support for multiple tickers per page!
  • jQuery News Ticker now has support for right-to-left languages!
  • jQuery News Ticker now has support for loading content via an RSS feed!
  • jQuery News Ticker now has an optional fade effect between items!
  • New updates have been made to jQuery News Ticker! Check below for more details!
  • jQuery News Ticker is now compatible with jQuery 1.3.2! See below for further details and for latest download.
  • Further updates to jQuery News Ticker are coming soon!

Member Profile: ddran (119 posts)

Advertisement    
 
Hello, I'm ddran (report this user)
I am from India
I last logged in on 20 Jan 2018
I have been a member since 28 Dec 2014
I have added 119 posts in trackitt forums
I added my last post on 20 Jan 2018
ddran's Immigration Cases
 
I-140 case: Approved in 5 days (169 days less than average)   (0 comments)
User: ddran Nationality: India
Applicant Type:primaryService Center:Texas
Category:EB2Priority Date:
Application Filed:07 Dec 2014USCIS Received Date:08 Dec 2014
USCIS Notice Date:09 Dec 2014USCIS Receipt Number:SRXXXXX
I-140/485 Filing:non-concurrentProcessing Type:premium
RFE Received?:noRFE Received Date:
Reason for RFE:RFE Replied Date:
Application Status:approvedApproval/Denial Date:12 Dec 2014
Total Processing Time:5 daysMost Recent LUD:
Days Elapsed:
Case Added to Tracker: 28 Dec 2014 Last Updated: 28 Dec 2014
Notes:
ddran's Posts
1 2 3 4 5  Next »
Posted in I-140 Forum on 20 Jan 2018
Topic: Approved I140 - Returning back to USA

Based on the new i140 rule, you can use it for H1B cap exempt even your employer withdraw your i140 (though minimum 6 months it should be valid).
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 13 Jan 2018
Topic: Feedback on IV call

You nailed it on IV.
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 13 Jan 2018
Topic: Feedback on IV call

May be Shalabh Kumar will talk to Trump on behalf of Employers to continue backlog. If Trump clears backlog he may get one million plus vote for Republicans from skilled immigrants , billions of $$$$, positive impact on economy, thousands of startups, thousands of high tech new jobs.
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 12 Jan 2018
Topic: Feedback on IV call

Below is IV call summary on 01/11/2018:
1.Advocacy event in DC - 02/04/2018 - 02/06/2018
2. Is DACA bill possible before 01/19/2018 - No, its not possible
3. Should we need to change the language in HR392 to remove family immigration in the bill(attached chain immigration in HR392) - No not possible, it will harm the bill if we remove
4. Options to pass HR392 - attach a fee to it. Still not sure what could be the fee. Employers are against HR392, they dont want to clear the backlog. Reach out to your employer to get the support for the bill.
5. HR392 is IV child since 2011. If its passed then credit should go to IV but if its failed then its SIIA and other organization who played spoiler as each organization have their own agenda. If all of us demand HR392 in one voice then HR392 is possible.
6.If HR392 is not part of any DACA bill, then HR392 is dead.
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 20 Dec 2017
Topic: SIIA National Call on 12/20/2017

Summary:

1. Advocacy Event in Washington on Feb 8, 2018: Plan to bring 5000 people including skilled workers and family. Many other organizations also joining the event.
2. This is the last chance, if we miss to address backlog issue now then no immigration change for next 10 years.
3. Does HR392 has any chance? Even Raise act remove country limit but it didnt address the backlog issue who already inside the country. Age play spoilsport for most the backlogged skilled workers. SIIA and congressmen believe that HR392 has less chance to pass in the current scenario. SIIA will work to solve the backlogged issues.
4. One of the Caller behaved unprofessional way in the call most probably from rough immigration group and he called himself as Ashwin (He is reluctant to say his name)
5. SIIA never collects money from remembers.
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 13 Dec 2017
Topic: H.R. 392, Fairness for High Skilled Immigrants Act

Even after 10 years, IV dont have maturity to understand which bill will/can pass the congress. No use of chest thumping that HR392 is the brain child of IV for past 10 years. No more excuses after 300+ cosponsors. IV please change the agenda to stay in the race.
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 25 Nov 2017
Topic: H.R. 392, Fairness for High Skilled Immigrants Act

Looks like HR392 dead for below reasons
1. Though its called High skilled immigrants bill, it has one important clause which alters family based GC which encourage chain immigration. Trump particularly against any sort of chain immigration.
2. Though this bill clears backlog for workers who struck for 10 years but new applicants will go into backlog loop. So this bill actually not fixing the backlog issue and seen as temporary or deferred solution, which will decimate already broken high skilled immigration system to maximum level.
3. RAISE act dont have the country cap. Also, Trump is keen to sign RAISE act. So as long as Raise act is in Govt Radar, Trump wont sign HR392 (basically it doesn't make any sense to sign HR392 and then sign Riase act).


Is above analysis make sense? comments welcome!
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 22 Nov 2017
Topic: Is Congress Bill HR392 dead?

Looks like HR392 dead for below reasons
1. Though its called High skilled immigrants bill, it has one important clause which alters family based GC which encourage chain immigration. Trump particularly against any sort of chain immigration.
2. Though this bill clears backlog for workers who struck for 10 years but new applicants will go into backlog loop. So this bill actually not fixing the backlog issue and seen as temporary or deferred solution, which will decimate already broken high skilled immigration system to maximum level.
3. RAISE act dont have the country cap. Also, Trump is keen to sign RAISE act. So as long as Raise act is in Govt Radar, Trump wont sign HR392 (basically it doesn't make any sense to sign HR392 and then sign Riase act).

Is above analysis make sense? comments welcome!
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 06 Nov 2017
Topic: H.R. 392, Fairness for High Skilled Immigrants Act

People from India followed the rule of the land. Its not mean that other country people who got green card are saints. Everyone misused the broken system and you people are lucky that you hail from less populated country and manged to frame the rule to favor less populated country which itself a fraud.
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in H-1B Forum on 09 Aug 2017
Topic: GA Drivers license renewal requires unexpired visa on passport

--If someone wants to take DDS to court, for sure GA law is in your side.

Requirement for Non-immigrants to renew driver license:

1. Proof of identity (Unexpired Passport and valid Visa) - This 'valid visa' is re-interrupted as 'Unexpired visa ' which is the mistake on the part of DMV. Valid Visa is actually is to prove that non-immigrant entered US legally .
2. Immigration document - i94 (this is the immigration document that proves an Non-immigrants is staying in US legally) or i797A Notice of action for temporary license for 120 days. If only Unexpired visa accepted then why we need 'i797A'? so its clear valid visa is not Unexpired visa.

Because of this small change many DMV's denying driving license for legal immigrants and violates Georgia law found in O.C.G.A. § 40-5-21.1

How is DDS acting against Georgia law?
The relevant Georgia law is found in O.C.G.A. § 40-5-21.1, “Temporary licenses, permits, or special identification cards; foreign licenses or identification cards as evidence of legal presence in the United States,” and specifically states that the following non-citizens may obtain a Georgia driver’s license:
(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of this title, an applicant who presents in person valid documentary evidence of:

(1) Admission to the United States in a valid, unexpired nonimmigrant status;
(2) A pending or approved application for asylum in the United States;
(3) Admission into the United States in refugee status;
(4) An approved application for temporary protected status in the United States;
(5) Approved deferred action status;
(6) Other federal documentation verified by the United States Department of Homeland Security to be valid documentary evidence of lawful presence in the United States under federal immigration law; or
(7) Verification of lawful presence as provided by Code Section 40-5-21.2 may be issued a temporary license, permit, or special identification card.

Such temporary license, permit, or special identification card shall be valid only during the period of time of the applicant's authorized stay in the United States or five years, whichever occurs first. (emphasis added)

The statute clearly says that a non-citizen may have a license during his or her period of authorized stay. “Authorized stay” under the immigration laws is a term used when a non-citizen has not yet achieved a permanent immigration status in the United States, but the immigration authorities are aware of the non-citizen’s presence in the United States and consent to or authorize their presence.
Employment authorization documents, at a minimum, represent that the non-citizen has a period of authorized stay in the United States. Every employment authorization document, regardless of the category, denotes an authorized stay in the United States by immigration authorities. DDS declines to understand this and believes that a non-citizen’s presence can still be unauthorized when he or she has a work permit. This is not true.
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 24 Oct 2016
Topic: I-140 EAD approved by OMB

In reginfo, last changes happened somewhere in May 2016 after that no changes.
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 23 Nov 2015
Topic: Obama EO: EAD for approved I 140

If its true that there is "Certain Period of Time " then there might be multiple options like if you have completed X number of years from the same employer then "Certain Period of Time " is n months or n+x months.
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 16 Nov 2015
Topic: Obama EO: EAD for approved I 140

1.Is I-140EAD AP rule applicable to the people with I140 approved from previous Employer - Only after Regulation published for public comments we know the details...till then everything is speculation
2. Timeline - Oct'2016
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 06 Oct 2015
Topic: Obama EO: EAD for approved I 140

Hey Comedy piece, no logic in your comment. if USCIS cant move filling date for EB2 then how it can move for EB3? how they can justify it..
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 08 Aug 2015
Topic: Obama EO: EAD for approved I 140

You are a nut if you think HR213 has a chance.
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 27 Jul 2015
Topic: Obama EO: EAD for approved I 140

Fundamental question is why people from India/China alone has to spend 6 years or 4 , 3 years.. this gives added advantage to employers, hence employers prefer to hire only Indians and lock them for many years. There are many issue with indians careers progress also. DHS proposed rule has to fix and relieve indians from this clutches.. if they propose 5+ years then again back to square no use..
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 11 Jul 2015
Topic: Obama EO: EAD for approved I 140

August Visa bulletin: How EB3 - China retrogressed to 2004 from 2011. How this is possible.
Good for EB3 India - jumped 6 months.
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 23 Jun 2015
Topic: Obama EO: EAD for approved I 140

IV should check its legal wing motive behind campaign like recapture and HR213..
I feel IV investing lot of money and time on week case like recapture and HR213.
Both wont materialize but still IV did lot of hard work to push but in first place good attorney might have advised that both this campaign wont move forward.
IV's move towards I140EAD is welcome one and they need to concentrate on the fix which is possible.


its my personal opinion. Why i am posting it in Trackitt? you all know
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 22 Jun 2015
Topic: Obama EO: EAD for approved I 140

++1
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 22 Jun 2015
Topic: Obama EO: EAD for approved I 140

I will be first one to donate IV or Any organization who file class action against USCIS for recapturing wasted Visas. Law can be interpreted that they can not recapture unused Visas when there is no demand..but in this case there is huge demand but sill Visas wasted by USCIS because there is no one to question USCIS.. Due this inefficiency lot of people has gone through mental agony..so Court can provide solution..
I don't like this postI like this post
1 2 3 4 5  Next »