close
Do you like trackitt?
  • jQuery News Ticker now has support for multiple tickers per page!
  • jQuery News Ticker now has support for right-to-left languages!
  • jQuery News Ticker now has support for loading content via an RSS feed!
  • jQuery News Ticker now has an optional fade effect between items!
  • New updates have been made to jQuery News Ticker! Check below for more details!
  • jQuery News Ticker is now compatible with jQuery 1.3.2! See below for further details and for latest download.
  • Further updates to jQuery News Ticker are coming soon!

Member Profile: hollywoodude (24 posts)

Advertisement    
 
Hello, I'm hollywoodude (report this user)
I am from India
I last logged in on 26 Jan 2018
I have been a member since 19 Jul 2017
I have added 24 posts in trackitt forums
I added my last post on 26 Jan 2018
hollywoodude's Posts
1 2 Next »
Posted in I-140 Forum on 26 Jan 2018
Topic: Parents of future Greencard holder or Citizens

The Goodlatte proposal created a new type of visa that will allow parents to stay long-term---they just can't immigrate and ultimately be entitled to benefits. If this does end up gaining traction, there may be a similar provision.
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-485 Forum on 19 Jan 2018
Topic: 2017 SO to EB2

Got it - This makes sense - Thanks a lot!
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-485 Forum on 19 Jan 2018
Topic: 2017 SO to EB2

Really? They spilled-over 2200 more visas to South Korea than their country cap? When those should have gone to India? A few hundred here or there is understandable, but 2200 seems like a huge error! Clearly against the regulations. Those should have gone to EB2-I. Have you seen such a massive misallocation before? Thanks
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-485 Forum on 19 Jan 2018
Topic: March 2018 VB Prediction

Does anyone have any idea how South Korea got 5000 visas in EB2 category?
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-485 Forum on 19 Jan 2018
Topic: 2017 SO to EB2

How did South Korea get 5,000 EB2??
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 08 Jan 2018
Topic: AC21 106 and 104

"until such time as a final decision is made on the alien’s lawful permanent residence."
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 05 Jan 2018
Topic: AC21 leak/rumors - many positives!!!

Almost everything you've said is wrong.
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 05 Jan 2018
Topic: H.R. 392, Fairness for High Skilled Immigrants Act

The ACT says only accredited foreign institutions will be awarded points (and the list will be restrictive), so that takes care of PhD mills.
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 04 Jan 2018
Topic: who is right: IV or immigration girl/lawyers

Not questioning that strategy. Would like to see HR 392 snuck in.
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 04 Jan 2018
Topic: who is right: IV or immigration girl/lawyers

Agreed. The way they are behaving is very unprofessional.
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 04 Jan 2018
Topic: N0 HR392 in DACA Bill

The way to do it would be to use the 55,000 diversity visas being eliminated to clear the backlog -- but we need to advocate for that
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 04 Jan 2018
Topic: who is right: IV or immigration girl/lawyers

Totally agree. Deal is happening. Best chance is to sneak in backlog relief in that. The other components of this bill -- DACA/Chain Migration/WALL-- will consume all the attention so that it is very possible to quietly get a good deal on backlog.

A great proposal would be to use the Diversity visas to clear the backlog and then eliminate the program
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 04 Jan 2018
Topic: H.R. 392, Fairness for High Skilled Immigrants Act

Yes
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 04 Jan 2018
Topic: Immigration Reform is coming soon

Yes, but the likely bill will include things the freedom caucus WANTS, like ending DV and chain migration, and some face-saving WALL earmarks. Once they get these things, sensible employment and backlog reforms can be tacked.
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 04 Jan 2018
Topic: Immigration Reform is coming soon

Based on the piecemeal bills ACTUALLY put forth so far, this is a fair assessment. I would push for reallocating DV visas to clear backlog, and then eliminating it.
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 04 Jan 2018
Topic: Immigration Reform is coming soon

I think RAISE does address chain migration, but need to check. But chain migration is definitely getting more play than employment immigration reform.
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 04 Jan 2018
Topic: Immigration Reform is coming soon

Agreed. Lindsey is level-headed, and a supporter of legal immigration. He is not going to craft anything drastic. There will have to be H1B reforms: most likely a version of the increase in H1B wage requirement, employer-employee, specialty occupation, etc. In exchange, there will hopefully be some backlog relief. Let's wait and see, but by all indications reform is the route the admin is focused, not AC21 regulations.
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 03 Jan 2018
Topic: H1b AC21 Cancellation: Trump's Nuclear option

This whole thing has been blown totally out of proportion. Their priorities, from DJT's mouth itself, are WALL, DACA, chain migration, and ending DV lottery. There will definitely be changes to H1b wage, specialty occupation etc, but they have several other things on their list before even getting to AC21.
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 03 Jan 2018
Topic: H1b AC21 Cancellation: Trump's Nuclear option

No impact. AOS/I-485 EAD is governed by different sections of AC21.
I don't like this postI like this post
Posted in I-140 Forum on 03 Jan 2018
Topic: H1b AC21 Cancellation: Trump's Nuclear option

Correct. Limiting to 1 year will not only bring more revenue, but will create recurring opportunities to DENY extension based on the new wage/specialty/employer-employee requirements. They will achieve the intended effect of reducing the bottom quartile of H1B through legally sound means.

If they overreach and stop all extensions, they are on very weak legal grounds, and risk a muslim ban type fiasco in court. Why go this route when they can accomplish what they want simply by limiting extension to 1 year?

Stopping all extensions means ultimately getting nothing accomplished. Limiting to 1 year means effecting bullet proof policy change.
I don't like this postI like this post
1 2 Next »